

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RL Food Testing Laboratory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com</link>
	<description>Fast. Accurate. Economical. Quality Nutritional Analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Gluten-Free the Recession Proof Specialty Food?</title>
		<link>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/12/04/is-gluten-free-the-recession-proof-specialty-food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/12/04/is-gluten-free-the-recession-proof-specialty-food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Vessels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleiac disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gluten-free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialty food trend]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems gluten-free is everywhere these days. Most of us probably know at least one person who has taken gluten (a wheat protein) out of their diet, whether for medical reasons or as part of a diet-health craze. Personally, I know 3 people who are gluten-free because of celiac disease. I have, myself, experimented with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><a href="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/iStock_000004647693XSmall1.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-464" title="Gluten-Free Energy Bar" src="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/iStock_000004647693XSmall1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="148" height="149" /></a>It seems gluten-free is everywhere these days. Most of us probably know at least one person who has taken gluten (a wheat protein) out of their diet, whether for medical reasons or as part of a diet-health craze. Personally, I know 3 people who are gluten-free because of celiac disease. I have, myself, experimented with removing gluten from my diet because of suspicions about digestion issues when I eat certain foods.  </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Ten years ago, gluten awareness was almost non-existent as it was considered to be mostly a ‘European problem.’ But today it would be impossible not to know what gluten-free or celiac disease meant. And many food companies big or small are investing capitol to jump on this gluten bandwagon. General Mills has recently reformulated their iconic Chex cereal to be gluten-free; an enormous undertaking that is turning out to be very profitable for the manufacturer.  </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: small;">In a recent New York Times article, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/magazine/Should-We-All-Go-Gluten-Free.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1&amp;sq=should we all go gluten-free&amp;st=cse&amp;scp=1" target="_blank">“Should We All Go Gluten-Free?”</a>  Keith O’Brien, a celiac diagnosed freelance writer, reports: </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">“Food companies are always trying to take advantage of the latest dietary trend or health craze. (Low carb, anyone?) But the story of how we got to a place where celiac disease is suddenly mainstream, prevalence rates are rising, perfectly healthy people are opting to eat gluten-free and General Mills is coveting these customers is an especially unlikely business narrative.”</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">The article goes on to explain how a 2003 study by Dr. Alessio Fasano, from the University of Maryland Center for Celiac Research, could have been the catalyst that began our country’s gluten awareness. In this American based study, 1 in every 133 people had celiac disease. If you were related to someone with celiac then the rate was 1 in 22. Fasano estimates that 18 million Americans have some degree of gluten sensitivity…18 million! Now, that’s a market.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">O’Brien further explains the market demand by sighting a study by Dr. Joseph A. Murray, a gastroenterologist at the Mayo Clinic. He found that young people today are 5 times more likely to have celiac disease. There seems to be no end in sight; we haven’t even hit the top of the barrel yet.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Which lead us to the question, has gluten-free foods hit their limit in the market place? Will their higher price tags eventually get consumers turned off the trend, or is it truly a recession proof food?</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Here at RL Food Testing Laboratory, we have witnessed this impressive trend over the past few years. As our Senior Chemist, Roger Legg explains, “There’s been a tremendous increase of companies that make gluten-free products requesting nutrition analysis and other services needed to go to retail. And we have seen no signs of this trend losing any momentum.&#8221;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">O’Brien’s findings seem to support our trend observations, as he shows:</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: small;">Niche companies like Amy’s Kitchen, Glutino, Enjoy Life, Bob’s Red Mill and Udi’s Gluten Free Foods are reporting incredible growth.</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: small;">Anheuser-Busch introduced Redbridge, a gluten-free beer, in 2006.</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: small;">Kellogg rolled out gluten-free Rice Krispies this year.</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: small;">Frito-Lay and Post Foods began gluten-free labeling this past year.</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: small;">General Mills reformulated their Rice Chex to remove gluten.</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: small;">Betty Crocker has brought gluten-free cake mixes to the market.</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">So, why would all these big manufacturers invest the capitol and man power to bring gluten-free products to market? And with the potential danger involved with stating gluten-free on the food label, why would a company want to take the risk of a possible recall? </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">The NY Times article explains:</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: small;">According to a recent Nielsen report on consumer trends, the volume of gluten-free products sold in the past year is up 37%.</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: small;">It’s reported by Spins, a market-research-and-consulting firm for the natural-products industry, that the gluten-free market is a $6.3 billion industry and growing, up 33% since 2009. </span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">And remember the iconic General Mills cereal that recently went gluten-free? Well, retail sales for Chex were up 29% in their Q1 of their 2012 fiscal year &#8211; alone.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: small;">Not bad for a niche product in a recession economy.  As O’Brien says, “It’s the golden age of gluten-free.”</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/magazine/Should-We-All-Go-Gluten-Free.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1&amp;sq=should we all go gluten-free&amp;st=cse&amp;scp=1" target="_blank">Click here to read the entire article.</a></span></span></p>
<div id="fb-root"></div><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><!-- Do not remove -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/12/04/is-gluten-free-the-recession-proof-specialty-food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do I Need a UPC Code Label for my New Food Product?</title>
		<link>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/29/do-i-need-a-upc-code-label-for-my-new-food-product/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/29/do-i-need-a-upc-code-label-for-my-new-food-product/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Vessels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food labeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food product labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail food labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPC codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upc labels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/?p=425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s on nearly every product we buy through a retailer: the black and white striped rectangle with a bunch of numbers under it – a UPC code. You see it every day, but do you know what it is? And if you are a start-up food company, do you need to have one on your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/upc-code2.tif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-428" title="upc code" src="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/upc-code2.tif" alt="" /></a>It’s on nearly every product we buy through a retailer: the black and white striped rectangle with a bunch of numbers under it – a UPC code. You see it every day, but do you know what it is? And if you are a start-up food company, do you need to have one on your labels?</p>
<p>Probably, but read on.</p>
<p>If you plan on selling prepackaged items in a retail environment, then you need to have a UPC label for each product that has differentiating attributes (different size, flavors). All retailers (mass merchants, grocery stores, health food stores) require a UPC code, which is the only code that can be scanned at the register.</p>
<p>There are some instances when the food manufacturer is not responsible for providing the UPC. For example: UPC codes for products that are variable weight or bulk food items (meat, poultry, pre-made salads) are usually made by the stores.</p>
<p>UPC codes are one of the most forgotten items that we see new food business overlook prior to taking their products to a retailer. And unfortunately, this could potentially be a costly mistake – as labels might have to be reprinted to include the UPC code.</p>
<p>So what is it? UPC stands for Universal Product Code and it consists of two parts: 12 numbers and a scan-able bar code made up of black and white stripes.</p>
<p>The first six numbers of the twelve are unique to the manufacturer or vendor and should be the same through all of the product line.</p>
<p>The next five numbers are unique to that product’s attributes.</p>
<p>The last number is a check digit – a way to ensure that the right numbers were scanned. How the check number is determined is a mathematical marvel and quite frankly, makes my head explode. According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Product_Code" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>, it is a process of adding the odd numbered digits, multiplying by 3, and then adding the even numbered digits, calculating the modula and subtracting from 10. I had you until modula, right? Simply put for us common folk…it checks to make sure the scan is right. When you have trouble scanning an item at the register, chances are the check digit is reading that something is wrong and kicks it back.</p>
<p>The scan-able barcode has different widths of black and white stripes assigned to each number on either the right or left side of the middle.</p>
<p>Although UPC codes come in different total numbers, for instance an 8 digit UPC code could be used for a smaller item; the standard 12 digit UPC is the most predominantly used in the United States.</p>
<p>Other Types:</p>
<p>A Master Carton UPC code or GTIN (Global Trade Item Number) maybe needed for your cases that will ship to a retailer’s warehouse. This number is typically your UPC code with 4 digits added that represent your pack quantity or how many items are in your master carton.</p>
<p>An EAN (European Article Number) is a code used when products ship from another country and uses an extra digit to represent their counties code. Products from the US can us their UPC codes, as our country code is 00.</p>
<p>Have you had any problems with UPC codes? Maybe a big retailer was ready to buy your goods and you had to rush to get your UPC labels made – click on the comment button below and share your story.</p>
<p>Or, did you just realize that you need UPC labels? Well, we can help with that…<a href="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/food-labeling/upc-bar-code/" target="_blank">click here</a> for more information.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="fb-root"></div><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><!-- Do not remove -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/29/do-i-need-a-upc-code-label-for-my-new-food-product/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA Opening Comment Period on Sodium Reduction Efforts</title>
		<link>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/19/fda-opening-comment-period-on-sodium-reduction-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/19/fda-opening-comment-period-on-sodium-reduction-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Vessels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium reduction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would seem that sodium is our hot topic lately. Last week, we talked about the hidden levels of sodium in processed foods and the importance of reading the nutrition fact panel. This week the FDA announced that it is opening the comment period regarding their approach to reducing sodium intake in America. So why [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/salt-calling.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-405" title="FDA Asking Comments on Salt Intake" src="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/salt-calling-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>It would seem that sodium is our hot topic lately. Last week, we talked about the hidden levels of sodium in processed foods and the importance of reading the nutrition fact panel. This week the <a href="http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/09/15/2011-23753/approaches-to-reducing-sodium-consumption-establishment-of-dockets-request-for-comments-data-and?utm_campaign=subscription+mailing+list&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=federalregister.gov">FDA announced</a> that it is opening the comment period regarding their approach to reducing sodium intake in America. So why all the fuss over a little salt?</p>
<p>Because too much sodium can lead to kidney disease, stroke, heart disease or even congestive heart failure. “How does this happen?” you ask. Well, if you consume too much sodium, then your body won’t be able to naturally get rid of it through your kidneys and it will be stored in your blood. This makes your body hold water, which increases blood volume, which makes your heart work harder to pump and increases your blood pressure. Chronic exposure to this whole routine can eventually lead to those scary health risks, as mentioned above.</p>
<p>“I don’t use that much salt!” you protest. You probably use more than you are aware of, considering that just one teaspoon of table salt has about 2,300 mg of sodium. A pinch here and there can really add up. Keep in mind that the average adult should consume no more than 2,300 mg a day (1,500 mg a day for those 51 and over, or if you already have kidney disease, high blood pressure or diabetes.)</p>
<p>Even if you don’t add table salt to your food, the majority of the average 3,400 mg of sodium a day that is consumed through processed foods. According to a 2009 report from the Institute of Medicine <a href="http://www.iom.edu/">(IOM)</a> 75% of the sodium consumption comes from eating processed foods. Sodium is used in foods for flavor and seasoning, but also as a preservative and curing agent it can play a critical role in food safety and extending shelf-life. Sodium can also enhance physical attributes of food, such as consistency, texture and shape.</p>
<p>The Center for Disease Control (CDC) reported that 40% of daily sodium intake comes from grain-based products (breads, cakes, cookies, crackers) and that 30% comes from processed meat products (bacon, sausage, lunch meat, chicken, fish).</p>
<p>The FDA wants to help Americans reduce their sodium consumption and they are looking for input on how to do it. Are any companies already having success with sodium reduction efforts? What is the current understanding amongst Americans with regards to the harmful effects of too much sodium in their diets? And what would motivate us to reduce our intake of sodium? Comments must be submitted by November 29, 2011.</p>
<p>Are you a food manufacturer and would like to look for ways to reduce the sodium levels in your foods? Some food labs will look for ways to reduce your final sodium levels. For more information, you can contact Roger Legg, our Senior Chemist at <a href="mailto:Roger@rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com">Roger@rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com</a> .</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="fb-root"></div><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><!-- Do not remove -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/19/fda-opening-comment-period-on-sodium-reduction-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sodium Conscious Shoppers Need to Read Nutrition Labels</title>
		<link>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/09/sodium-conscious-shoppers-need-to-read-nutrition-labels-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/09/sodium-conscious-shoppers-need-to-read-nutrition-labels-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 18:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Vessels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food labeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium reduction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/?p=385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans state that you should have less than 2,300 mg of sodium a day. If you are over 51 or have some health concerns such as high blood pressure or diabetes, then the recommended amount is 1,500 mg a day. The Mayo Clinic reports that Americans consume an average of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The 2010 <a href="http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2010.asp " target="_blank">Dietary Guidelines for Americans</a> state that you should have less than 2,300 mg of sodium a day. If you are over 51 or have some health concerns such as high blood pressure or diabetes, then the recommended amount is 1,500 mg a day.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/sodium/NU00284" target="_blank">Mayo Clinic</a> reports that Americans consume an average of 3,400 mg of sodium a day. Most of which comes from processed foods. So how can you be ‘salt savvy’ when shopping? They recommend that you read the food label and understand what the following <a href="http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/FoodLabelingNutrition/FoodLabelingGuide/ucm064911.htm" target="_blank">FDA mandated nutritional claims</a> mean:</p>
<p>Sodium-free: less than 5 mg per serving</p>
<p>Very low sodium: 35 mg or less per serving</p>
<p>Low sodium: 140 mg or less per serving</p>
<p>Reduced Sodium: Sodium has been reduced by 25% from regular version</p>
<p>Light in Sodium: Sodium has been reduced by 50% from regular version</p>
<p>Unsalted: Doesn’t mean “sodium-free”, just hasn’t had any salt added to the processing<a href="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/salt3.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-386" title="woman inspecting a nutrition label" src="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/salt3-150x150.jpg" alt="Look at nutrition fact labels" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Watch out</strong> for the total number of servings and be realistic with how many servings you will eat.  Also, just because a food declares reduced or light in sodium, doesn’t mean it is low sodium. The Mayo Clinic sights that, “regular canned chicken noodle soup contains about 1,100 mg of sodium per cup, so a product with 25 percent less sodium still has a whopping 820 mg of sodium per cup.”</p>
<p>The FDA defined nutritional claims are helpful in determining which food items are best for your sodium conscious diet, but do not solely rely on them to make the best choice – read the nutrition fact panel label, too.</p>
<div id="fb-root"></div><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><!-- Do not remove -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/09/sodium-conscious-shoppers-need-to-read-nutrition-labels-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USDA Requests Nutrition Labeling Info from Schools</title>
		<link>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/02/usda-requests-nutrition-labeling-info-from-schools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/02/usda-requests-nutrition-labeling-info-from-schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Vessels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritional quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Agriculture&#8217;s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)  is requesting food nutrition information available to schools that participate in the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program (“SMPs”). According to the Federal Register dated 8/19/2011, “FNS is interested in examining what nutrition information and ingredient lists are made available to schools, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/RL-School2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-376" title="School Lunch" src="http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/RL-School2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>The U.S. Department of Agriculture&#8217;s Food and Nutrition Service <a href="http://www.fns.usda.gov/fns/" target="_blank">(FNS)</a>  is requesting food nutrition information available to schools that participate in the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program (“SMPs”). According to the <a href="http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/08/19/2011-21148/availability-to-school-food-authorities-of-nutrition-information-and-ingredient-lists-for-foods-used?utm_campaign=email+a+friend&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=federalregister.gov#p-5" target="_blank">Federal Register</a> dated 8/19/2011, “FNS is interested in examining what nutrition information and ingredient lists are made available to schools, the manner and scope of the information&#8217;s accessibility, and how that information and accessibility compare with the information schools may be seeking” in hopes to better understand how schools are currently deciding how to plan their menus and buy their foods.</p>
<p>This request is prompted by a number of inquiries that FNS has received from schools regarding their current access to nutrition information and ingredient lists.</p>
<p>Information must be submitted on or before 11/17/2011 at: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/">http://www.regulations.gov</a>.</p>
<div id="fb-root"></div><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><!-- Do not remove -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/09/02/usda-requests-nutrition-labeling-info-from-schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pet Food Label Requirements</title>
		<link>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/25/pet-food-label-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/25/pet-food-label-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Vessels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food product labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet food analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet food labeling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you thinking about putting a new pet food on the market? Maybe dog bones or cat treats? There is certain criteria that you should be aware of when it comes to the labeling. According to the FDA, “pet food labeling is regulated at two levels. The federal regulations, enforced by the United States Food [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you thinking about putting a new pet food on the market? Maybe dog bones or cat treats? There is certain criteria that you should be aware of when it comes to the labeling. According to the<a href="http://www.fda.gov/animalveterinary/resourcesforyou/ucm047113.htm" target="_blank"> FDA</a>, “pet food labeling is regulated at two levels. The federal regulations, enforced by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)…some states also enforce their own labeling regulations. Many states have adopted the model pet food regulations established by the <a href="http://www.aafco.org/" target="_blank">Association of American Feed Control Officials </a>(AAFCO). &#8221;</p>
<p>FDA regulations include: proper identification of product, net quantity statement (how much is in the container), manufacturers name and address and a proper list of ingredients.</p>
<p>Many states requirements include: product name (governed by four AAFCO rules regarding percentages of named ingredient in the total product), guaranteed analysis, nutritional adequacy statement, feeding directions and a calorie statement – all of which are dictated by the AAFCO.</p>
<p>Other label claim regulations to be aware of are the terms “natural” and “organic”. The AAFCO has developed a definition and guidelines for what types of ingredients can be considered “natural.” There are currently no rules governing the term “organic’” but the USDA is currently working on establishing what kind of synthetic additives can be in pet food that is labeled “organic.”</p>
<p>Before you print your labels, know the federal and state laws that you will need to comply with, it could save you from an unnecessary costly reprint.</p>
<div id="fb-root"></div><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><!-- Do not remove -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/25/pet-food-label-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gov Focuses on Kid&#8217;s Nutritional Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/16/gov-focuses-on-kids-nutritional-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/16/gov-focuses-on-kids-nutritional-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Vessels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food labeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food product labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritional quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent study by Yale University’s Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity  may support a proposal from the Interagency Working Group, a combined effort of four government agencies including the FTC, the FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The proposal asks for a voluntary effort to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent study by <a href="http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/resources/upload/docs/what/advertising/Nutrition-RelatedClaims_PHN_8.11.pdf" target="_blank">Yale University’s Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity</a>  may support a proposal from the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2011/04/110428foodmarketproposedguide.pdf" target="_blank">Interagency Working Group</a>, a combined effort of four government agencies including the FTC, the FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The proposal asks for a voluntary effort to develop ‘stronger more meaningful marketing and nutritional principals’ when it comes to kids foods.  In an <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/04/foodmarket.shtm" target="_blank">April 2011 news release</a>, Kathleen Sebelius, Health and Human Services Secretary, said, “These new Principles will help food and beverage companies use their creativity and resources to strengthen parents’ efforts to encourage their children to make healthy choices.”</p>
<p>The Yale study found that parents were often mislead with sometimes ‘questionable’ health claims on children’s cereals – thinking that they were more nutritious than in actuality.</p>
<div id="fb-root"></div><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><!-- Do not remove -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/16/gov-focuses-on-kids-nutritional-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lobster Not in Zabar&#8217;s Lobster Salad</title>
		<link>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/12/lobster-not-in-zabars-lobster-salad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/12/lobster-not-in-zabars-lobster-salad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Vessels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food labeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition labeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recipe modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail food labels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For over 15 years the upscale upper-west side market, Zabars, has sold their Lobster salad to unaware New Yorkers and it took, Doug MacCash, a vacationing reporter from New Orleans to notice the familiar crayfish taste when he ordered one of the popular salads on a bagel. Turns out the expensive lobster salad has absolutely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For over 15 years the upscale upper-west side market, Zabars, has sold their Lobster salad to unaware New Yorkers and it took, Doug MacCash, a vacationing reporter from New Orleans to notice the familiar crayfish taste when he ordered one of the popular salads on a bagel. Turns out the expensive lobster salad has absolutely no lobster in it, but made with fresh water crayfish. Yesterday, in a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/12/nyregion/sold-as-lobster-salad-but-a-key-ingredient-was-missing.html" target="_blank">New York Times</a> article, Dane Somers, Executive Director of the <a href="http://www.lobsterfrommaine.com/" target="_blank">Maine Lobster Council</a>, said this kind of problem comes up about a dozen times a year, “sometimes it’s using lobster substitutes.”</p>
<p>Ever wonder what is in your favorite foods? People getting their favorite foods tested for allergens and purity claims is a growing trend that we see, because you just never know&#8230; lobster might not be in the lobster salad.</p>
<div id="fb-root"></div><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><!-- Do not remove -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/12/lobster-not-in-zabars-lobster-salad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA Reopens &#8220;Gluten-Free&#8221; Labeling Comment Period</title>
		<link>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/04/fda-reopens-gluten-free-labeling-comment-period/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/04/fda-reopens-gluten-free-labeling-comment-period/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Vessels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleiac disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food labeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gluten-free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the FDA  announced the reopening of the comment period for their proposed rule on Gluten-Free Labeling from January 23, 2007 (72 FR 2795),  in an effort to better define “gluten-free.” Also up for comments is the FDA’s report titled, “Health Hazard Assessment for Effects of Gluten Exposure in Individuals with Celiac Disease: Determination of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the<a href="http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/08/03/2011-19620/food-labeling-gluten-free-labeling-of-foods-reopening-of-the-comment-period#p-26" target="_blank"> FDA</a>  announced the reopening of the comment period for their proposed rule on Gluten-Free Labeling from January 23, 2007 <a href="http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2007/01/23/E7-843/food-labeling-gluten-free-labeling-of-foods#p-3" target="_blank">(72 FR 2795), </a> in an effort to better define “gluten-free.”</p>
<p>Also up for comments is the FDA’s report titled, “Health Hazard Assessment for Effects of Gluten Exposure in Individuals with Celiac Disease: Determination of Tolerable Daily Intake Levels and Levels of Concern for Gluten” (“Gluten Report”).   Comments are requested on whether or not this assessment should affect the final definition of Gluten-Free.</p>
<p>The comment period will end 10/03/2011.</p>
<div id="fb-root"></div><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><!-- Do not remove -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/04/fda-reopens-gluten-free-labeling-comment-period/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olive Oil Purity</title>
		<link>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/02/olive-oil-purity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/02/olive-oil-purity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Vessels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food laboratory analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imported foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritional marketing claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritional quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olive oil purity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialty food trend]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent study from UC Davis Olive Center  and the Australian Oils Research Laboratory has people questioning the purity claims made on the olive oil they purchase. The study found that nearly two-thirds of extra-virgin olive oils found in California grocery stores weren’t what they were claiming to be – and most of them were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent study from <a href="http://olivecenter.ucdavis.edu/news-events/news/files/olive%20oil%20final%20071410%20.pdf " target="_blank">UC Davis Olive Center</a>  and the Australian Oils Research Laboratory has people questioning the purity claims made on the olive oil they purchase. The study found that nearly two-thirds of extra-virgin olive oils found in California grocery stores weren’t what they were claiming to be – and most of them were pricey import brands.</p>
<p>Our very own Roger Legg, Senior Nutrition Chemist at RL Food Testing Laboratories, explains, “There are two common criteria for classifying different grades or purity of olive oil: fatty acid percentage, u.v. absorbance at two wavelengths 232 and 270 nm and a calculated delta K value. Based on these results from laboratory testing a company can make a claim about the purity.”</p>
<p>Do you have more questions about Olive Oil testing? Email Roger at <a href="mailto:roger@rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com">roger@rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com</a></p>
<div id="fb-root"></div><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><!-- Do not remove -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlfoodtestinglaboratory.com/2011/08/02/olive-oil-purity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

